Live your best possible life. How good can it get?

Have you ever wished you could jump into another world–another reality?  Maybe you already have!

There is an unspoken assumption that we all agree that there exists one consistent set of true historical events–and therefore can expect that all our individual memories ought to correspond to this singular, objective reality.  That’s an unspoken assumption, and it’s not really questioned.  We tend to expect that all of our individual experiences and memories map onto that one, singular, objective reality.  But what if that assumption is not true?

What if we exist within a holographic multiverse of ever-shifting realities, in which we sometimes find that rather than one fixed set of historical facts, we can find ourselves remembering something different from what official historical–culturally correct–records suggest?

If we do exist within something like a holographic multiverse of ever-shifting realities, we could expect to witness what we now know as the Mandela Effect.  The Mandela Effect is the phenomenon where we actually do remember foods such as Haas avocados, and Stouffer’s Stovetop stuffing, for example. I live in California, and I always pronounced the name of these California avocados as “haaas” and I would have pronounced the word “hass” if that was how it was spelled, but I didn’t do that because it wasn’t spelled that way.  And now, it’s supposedly always been spelled “Hass” avocados.  With Stovetop stuffing, that’s a case where I clearly remember the TV commercials that very clearly stated this popular product was Stouffer’s stovetop stuffing, but now supposedly it’s always only and ever been Kraft stovetop stuffing.

And, it’s important to point out that if we are living in a holographic multiverse, as I suggest in my book, Quantum Jumps, we could occasionally expect to witness dramatic changes–such as witnessing ourselves or others undergo spontaneous remissions from injuries and illnesses.

For those of us witnessing reality shifts, quantum jumps, and the Mandela Effect, there is no need to provide “extraordinary evidence,” since those of us who are experiencers are not simply making “extraordinary claims,” but rather are simply sharing the facts of our personal experiences.  Thousands of first-hand case studies of these observations have been documented with dates, geographic locations, first-hand reports, and commentary since 1999 on the RealityShifters website.  Our ‘evidence’ exists in our awareness–in the form of qualia, which is associated with the so-called “hard problem” of consciousness.  How can you prove the concept of our unique, subjective experiences of consciousness–and reality–that we see in qualia?  This is called a hard problem, because it is not a matter that can be easily translated to materialistic form.  Similarly, we cannot prove the concept of the Mandela Effect, since it is a similarly hard problem.

As widespread as the assumption of a singular objective reality is, it directly conflicts with the idea from quantum physics that “quantum physics prohibits a single history,” as well as some recent quantum physics experimental findings that two observational devices at the same place and time can literally observe two different subjective realities.  Also, experience of the Mandela Effect is gaining traction and gaining ground.

Quantum Physics Prohibits a Single History

The purpose of the science of physics is to understand how the universe behaves by studying the behaviors of matter and energy through space and time.  Through such scientific study, physics has found some truly paradigm-shifting principles in quantum physics.

Physicists Stephen Hawking and Thomas Hertog ca-authored a paper in 2006, claiming that the Universe has no singular or unique beginning.  Hertog states, “Quantum mechanics forbids a single history.”  Hawking and Hertog referred to their theory ‘top-down’ cosmology, because instead of focusing primarily on seeking a fundamental set of initial physical laws under which the cosmos unfolded, it starts ‘at the top,’ with what we see today, and then works backwards to see what the initial conditions must have been.

The Observer’s Perspective Effect

C. Brukner’s 2019 paper described recent physics research experiments showing that two observational devices set up at the same place and set to make and record observations at the same time can–and sometimes do–make very different observations.  When we see how this physics experiment challenges objective reality, we see experimental results providing validation that we can expect to sometimes witness alternate histories from what others observe.  And this is exactly what we are observing when we notice reality shifts, quantum jumps, and the Mandela Effect.

The ‘Hard Problem’ of Consciousness

The hard problem of memory has a precedent in the so-called ‘hard problem of consciousness,’ because it delves into areas that materialist science based on material realism cannot adequately address or describe.  This hard problem has to do with why and how we have qualia, or first-person experiences that feel like something.  This is referred to as a ‘hard problem’ in contrast to such ‘easier’ matters of explaining various cognitive functions including:  learning, memory, verbal communication, and perceptual integration.

What I love about the so-called ‘hard problem’ is that it reminds me of the philosophical question, “Why is there anything at all?”  By going directly to contemplate the idea of nothingness–and somethingness–we find ourselves contemplating a cosmos outside Time and Space.  What might exist in such imagined realms?  When I imagine what lies outside of time and space, I get a sense that there exists a sense of existence in the form of wisdom of being–the inspiration behind knowledge and meaning.  We gain a sense of our true selves in the form of pure consciousness.

How can we Recognize Adjacent Realities?

Returning to the original question:  What if you want to jump into another world?  Maybe you already have!  Once we recognize that we indeed likely have jumped into other worlds, other realities–how can we learn to recognize when we are next to these adjacent realities?  We can be quite close to other possible realities in every moment.

You can ask yourself how you would feel when you are adjacent to another reality?  What are the kinds of qualia–the internal consciousness, “hard problem” stuff that can’t yet be fully recorded in accordance with methods and practices that are part of materialistic science.  There is no way to objectively document or measure such experiences, because they are so uniquely individual to each of our experiences.

But the good news is that you can tell when you are adjacent to another possible reality.  Just as you can tell when something good is cooking in the other room, because you can smell it–similarly, you can feel and sense when there is a good reality adjacent to your own.

And if you sense that there isn’t yet any such good reality, then you can change your internal emotions and energies to make yourself much more positive.  You can feel gratitude, and feel grateful.  You can feel reverence, and choose to experience Revhumanism (rather than Transhumanism).  You can become aware of the amazing opportunities in every moment, as you keep asking, “How good can it get?” and you can keep finding out.  This works even when life is as chaotic as it sometimes gets, such as during this pandemic year of 2020 going into 2021.

Acknowledging our ability to make different observations from different perspectives, we do well to remember to keep asking, “How good can it get?”  Let’s find out together!

.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .

And I invite you to watch the companion video to this blog at:


QuantumJumps300x150adCynthia Sue Larson is the best-selling author of six books, including Quantum Jumps.  Cynthia has a degree in physics from UC Berkeley, an MBA degree, a Doctor of Divinity, and a second degree black belt in Kuk Sool Won. Cynthia is the founder of RealityShifters, and is president of the International Mandela Effect Conference. Cynthia hosts “Living the Quantum Dream” on the DreamVisions7 radio network, and has been featured in numerous shows including Gaia, the History Channel, Coast to Coast AM, One World with Deepak Chopra, and BBC. Cynthia reminds us to ask in every situation, “How good can it get?” Subscribe to her free monthly ezine at:

Comments on: "Want to jump into another world? Maybe you already have!" (10)

  1. Yes, even I remember “Stouffer’s”

    Duckduckgo’s first search result shows an alternate reality website ( probably because I’m reading this blog – haha)
    Google shows more “kraft” type links.

    Bottom-line; I’m like Pepperidge Farms…
    I remember

  2. I have a lot of reading material to work through – but… I’ll check out your book when I get a chance.

  3. Jon Harbour said:

    Good review, Cynthia. This is all completely subjective, but I have felt at times that there are 2 realities that I move between from time to time. I used to suspect that I was bipolar, and in recent years, that has gotten stronger, but to this day I can’t say whether I do have BD or that I’m alternating between 2 realities because the differences are subtle. I never would have noticed them if I hadn’t started paying attention (around 2010). I don’t even bother discussing it with friends/family because even I don’t know the extant of the experience, only that it happens, people in my life change ever-so-slightly between two patterns/versions.

    Now, as for the physics, I do not believe there are infinite realities with duplicates of my consciousness. I believe there are infinite *probabilities*, some of which may be high enough to take shape from time to time. As if, perhaps, and I’m just guessing here, but perhaps one reality is 50.00000000001% probable, and the other is 49.00000000009% probable, and by doing certain things in my life, I’ve raised the probability of the less likely reality. This feels more reasonable to me than the other perspectives fwiw. Maybe I’ve flip-flopped enough that the difference is extremely small, like thousands of a percent, so that one or the other reality becomes active based on my moods.

    And this is 100% subjective for me only. Every other person is unaffected. Are they real in my reality? Yes, inasmuch as they do not affect my probabilities. Like, if I were an extreme extrovert with hundreds of friends who are always affecting my decisions, then I would never shift into a near-reality. But if I’m an introvert who doesn’t go out much? That is another story.

    • Thanks for sharing your observations, Jon! I agree that most people mention awareness of just a couple of possible realities. And even Mandela Effects typically only include a couple of reality choices between possible worlds–with some noteworthy exceptions, such as hand position on the “Thinker” sculpture by Rodin. I suspect there likely exists a dimensional component to what human individuals recognize, meaning that when we live in 3D (plus time) physical reality, we thus would typically notice and observe just two primary ‘choices’ at any given decision point. Yet there does at this juncture appear to be a blossoming awareness within humankind that we are expanding our dimensional awareness, so I would thus expect humans to begin more often noticing three realities we sometimes flip-flop-fly between.

      • p.s. I meant to write 49.99999999999%. 🙂 But in reality it probably extends a few million places to the right of the decimal; as such, one might just say 49.9/50.1, but my intent was to say that it’s never 50/50, and I’m not sure how to present that mathematically (e.g. it’s never balanced).

        It’s also possible (there’s a somewhat useless word) that branching out of those two realities that I’m suspicious about are further divisions and one may pass into a sub-division and get stuck there without ever retreating back to the main branch. What does that look like?

        When one person branches (hypothetically) deep into a sub-division of their own perceived realities, there are not infinite duplicates of the rest of us. The way I see it, if another person is not affected by one’s decisions, then their perceptions (their reality) is not shared. We can be aware of them but unless we affect them, we are only seeing reflections of their reality.

        In other words, I believe we each have one soul which transcends our brain structure, and that soul is not duplicated. How then to explain how each person can experience a different reality? Well, maybe we don’t. Maybe we are all somewhat forcibly stuck in the same major branch, but maybe we can exist in sub-divisions on our own. In computer science, there’s a methodology that uses data hiding and inheritance to describe derivative things, like the way in which “Toyota Tacoma” inherits from “Truck” which inherits from “Car” (e.g. they all have 4 wheels, an engine, and steering wheel, but become increasingly specialized along each sub-division). Our minds store information like this as well. When you think of a Toyota Tacoma (or Ford F-150, for example) you don’t need to be told that it has 4 wheels, an engine and steering wheel: your brain assumes the inheritance.

        I’m trying to explain how we might each have one soul in the multiverse and not sure if that argument works or even if it’s appropriate but worth a try. I enjoy thinking about this.

  4. Lori Young said:

    Wow! What an amazing writing. I guess we’re from the same universe (and same state). I too remember “Haas”.
    And I also have a feel for sensing the next universe/reality and thankfully, making better decisions via quantum consciousness.
    This subject reminds me of all the new quantum apps my family and I explore together. Our favorites are Ranonautica and Universe Splitters so far. We really enjoy using our intentions and Ranonautica’s interesting mapping of anomalous energies. It has really opened up some good stuff in our reality. We can attest this is a quantum tool.
    On my various “Universe Splitter ” apps, I currently am residing in “Universe B”. I think these apps are an interesting evolution in Mandela Effects and Reality Shifting. Curious if you’ve experienced or heard of these new apps coming out?
    Really grateful for you and your work on this subject.

    • Dear Lori, I’ve been following more of the low-tech, ‘old school’ methods for communing with the cosmos most all of my life. My mother’s mother (“MorMor” in Swedish) asked me each morning when I awoke, “What did you dream last night?” and I began to pay close attention to both dreams and daydreams as indicators, previews and guides to how events then subsequently play out in everyday life and reality. My MorMor also demonstrated various types of divination, including reading a variety of signs, so from an early age I also began paying attention to evidence of subtle energies. So while I’ve still not yet acquired a cell phone, nor worked with these cell phone apps you mention, I can certainly appreciate their value in assisting people in taking a more active role in playing with and conversing with levels of consciousness in the cosmos.
      Lots of love,

  5. […] Want to jump into another world? Maybe you already have! by Cynthia Larson […]

  6. […] Want to jump into another world? Maybe you already have! by Cynthia Larson […]

  7. Cynthia, my little story, Deer Don’t Have Headlights is a perfect example of what you are talking about:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: